> I think the current coding is extremely fragile (if it indeed works at
> all) because of its assumption that <limits.h> has been included

Well, this is the case in the code so far. 

> already.  In any case, we have configure tests that exist only for the
> benefit of contrib modules, so it's hard to argue that we shouldn't have
> one that exists only for ecpg.
> 
> I think we should fix this (properly) for 9.0.

Ok, I don't mind fixing it properly for 9.0. Will do so as soon as I find time.

Michael

-- 
Michael Meskes
Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org)
Michael at BorussiaFan dot De, Meskes at (Debian|Postgresql) dot Org
ICQ 179140304, AIM/Yahoo/Skype michaelmeskes, Jabber mes...@jabber.org
VfL Borussia! Força Barça! Go SF 49ers! Use Debian GNU/Linux, PostgreSQL

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to