On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 3:13 PM, Simon Riggs <si...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: >> I don't really understand this comment. I have said, and I believe, >> that a system without quorum commit is simpler than one with quorum >> commit. I'd debate the point with you but I find the point so >> self-evident that I don't even know where to begin arguing it. > >> It's simply an opinion, which I believe to >> be based on solid technical reasoning, but which I might change my >> mind about if someone convinces me that I'm looking at the problem the >> wrong way. > > You're saying you have solid technical reasons, but they are so > self-evident that you can't even begin to argue them. Why are you so > sure your reasons are solid?? Regrettably, I say this doesn't make any > sense, however much you write.
Yeah, especially when you juxtapose two different parts of my email that were talking about different things. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise Postgres Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
