On Wed, 2010-05-26 at 15:37 -0400, Robert Haas wrote: > On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 3:13 PM, Simon Riggs <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I don't really understand this comment. I have said, and I believe, > >> that a system without quorum commit is simpler than one with quorum > >> commit. I'd debate the point with you but I find the point so > >> self-evident that I don't even know where to begin arguing it. > > > >> It's simply an opinion, which I believe to > >> be based on solid technical reasoning, but which I might change my > >> mind about if someone convinces me that I'm looking at the problem the > >> wrong way. > > > > You're saying you have solid technical reasons, but they are so > > self-evident that you can't even begin to argue them. Why are you so > > sure your reasons are solid?? Regrettably, I say this doesn't make any > > sense, however much you write. > > Yeah, especially when you juxtapose two different parts of my email > that were talking about different things.
/me rings bell and orders the fighters to their respective corners. > > -- > Robert Haas > EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com > The Enterprise Postgres Company > -- PostgreSQL.org Major Contributor Command Prompt, Inc: http://www.commandprompt.com/ - 503.667.4564 Consulting, Training, Support, Custom Development, Engineering -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
