At 2010-05-27 08:50:18 +0200, pavel.steh...@gmail.com wrote: > > I don't see any advantage of "FOR". We can change ir to support new > standard or don't change it.
Adopting FOR would mean we don't use AS in a way that conflicts with the standard. That's its only advantage. But I agree with you, I don't think it's worth inventing a new non-standard wart for this case. I don't really like the idea of getting rid of => as an operator either; I'm torn between staying true to the standard and politely looking the other way as Tom suggested we might end up doing. -- ams -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
