2010/5/27 Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com>: > On 27/05/10 09:50, Pavel Stehule wrote: >> >> 2010/5/27 Heikki Linnakangas<heikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com>: >>> >>> AFAIU, the standard doesn't say anything about named parameters. Oracle >>> uses >>> =>, but as you said, that's ambiguous with the => operator. >>> >>> +1 for FOR. >> >> I don't see any advantage of "FOR". > > Any advantage over AS? It doesn't clash with the "foo AS bar" syntax that > the standard is using for something completely different, as Peter pointed > out in the original post.
No, standard knows "AS" in different context. In param list standard doesn't use keyword "AS". > >> We can change ir to support new standard or don't change it. > > What new standard? > ANSI SQL 2011 Pavel > -- > Heikki Linnakangas > EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com > -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
