On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 11:36 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > "David E. Wheeler" <da...@kineticode.com> writes: >> On May 31, 2010, at 7:40 PM, Robert Haas wrote: >>> I was going to propose ==> across the board. > >> What about -> ? > > hstore already uses that for something else. > > Robert's idea isn't a bad one if we're forced to rename the operator. > I'd still like to know exactly how hard the concrete has set on the > SQL spec draft, first. (Peter?)
Given the way hstore uses ->, another reasonable choice might be --> That way we'd have -> and --> instead of -> and ==> -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise Postgres Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
