Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> writes: > Are we sure we want hstore compatibility to drive this decision?
hstore is what it is, and has been that way for a long time. We can't just ignore it. And I don't think breaking it (and probably other code) on zero notice is an acceptable outcome. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers