On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 12:01 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Fujii Masao <masao.fu...@gmail.com> writes: >> But I think that we don't need to specify other than the wildcard >> in the database field of .pgpass to use the replication-specific >> password if the replication-specific user is supplied in .pgpass. >> So the current code is enough for me. Am I missing something? > > You're looking at it from the perspective of somebody who knows > exactly how the code works. What Andrew tried is exactly what > 95% of other people would try. There doesn't seem to me to be > any very good argument against making it work for them.
Hmm.. is it worth going back to my proposal? Regards, -- Fujii Masao NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION NTT Open Source Software Center -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
