On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 04:56, Fujii Masao <masao.fu...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 7:14 PM, Heikki Linnakangas > <heikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: >> On 09/06/10 08:24, Fujii Masao wrote: >>> >>> On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 12:52 PM, Andrew Dunstan<and...@dunslane.net> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> There is precedent for .pgpass being a bit ambiguous. See the way >>>> "localhost" is used. >>> >>> OK. The attached patch allows us to use "replication" in the database >>> field of the .pgpass file, for the replication connection. >> >> Thanks, committed with some rewording of the docs and comments. I hope I >> made them better, not worse. > > I could confirm that this has been committed via git log, but not find > the related post on the pgsql-committers. Is there a problem in the > mailing-list?
The cvs server has a delivery of the email to the mailinglist server at least, so it's not there that has the problem. However, there were a lot of unexplained issues across multiple hub.org hosted machines that day (and nearby, iirc), including the mailserver and the dns servers. It was probably eaten by one of those issues. -- Magnus Hagander Me: http://www.hagander.net/ Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/ -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
