Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 6:45 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > Andrew Dunstan <and...@dunslane.net> writes: > >> I prefer archive_cleanup_command. We should name things after their > >> principal function, not an implementation detail, IMNSHO. > > > > Weak preference for archive_cleanup_command here. > > OK, sounds like we have consensus on that. Who wants to do it?
Do we just need to replace all of them? If so, patch attached. I replaced 3 terms: recovery_end_command, recovery-end-command, and recoveryEndCommand. Regards, --- Takahiro Itagaki NTT Open Source Software Center
archive_cleanup_command.patch
Description: Binary data
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
