On Tue, 2010-06-08 at 17:24 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Andrew Dunstan <and...@dunslane.net> writes: > > Well, yes. But then to stop that you could just lock users out using > > pg_hba.conf, no? It just doesn't seem to be buying all that much to me. > > The main reason to turn it off is to disable a whole lot of very poorly > tested code, and thereby improve the reliability of your warm standby > server.
> There might be (almost certainly are) significant performance > benefits as well. I would be happy to look over any performance results you have that show this to be true. I only know of one area I thought was a significant loss in some cases, which you canned because we had no evidence it was a problem... -- Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
