On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 1:00 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: >> Not sure I agree with this - what I think the problem is here is we >> need to make a clear distinction between recoverable errors and >> unrecoverable errors. > > Um, if it's recoverable, it's not really an error ...
Gah. This thread is a terminological mess. I'm using the term "error" generally, not in the PG-specific sense of ERROR. "problems after which there is a sane way to continue and problems after which there isn't" -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise Postgres Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
