On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 20:22, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Simon Riggs <si...@2ndquadrant.com> writes: >> LOG is already over-used and so anything said at that level is drowned. > > This is nonsense.
Whether it's over-used or not may be, but that doesn't make the general issue nonsense. But the fact is that having LOG at a higher priority than WARNING and ERROR is un-intuitive in the extreme, and I bet there aren't many non-experts who realize this. I don't know of any other software that does this. Heck, *experienced* postgresql users keep getting this wrong. Perhaps we need to re-think the naming there? -- Magnus Hagander Me: http://www.hagander.net/ Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/ -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
