Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > I don't know what to do about this This probably is out of the question for 9.0 based on scale of change, and maybe forever based on the impact of WAL volume, but -- if we logged "before" images along with the "after", we could undo the work of the "over-eager" transactions on the slave upon reconnect. -Kevin
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
