Fujii Masao <masao.fu...@gmail.com> writes: > On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 5:26 AM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: >> The real problem here is that we're sending records to the slave which >> might cease to exist on the master if it unexpectedly reboots. I >> believe that what we need to do is make sure that the master only >> sends WAL it has already fsync'd (Tom suggested on another thread that >> this might be necessary, and I think it's now clear that it is 100% >> necessary).
> The attached patch changes walsender so that it always sends WAL up to > LogwrtResult.Flush instead of LogwrtResult.Write. Applied, along with some minor comment improvements of my own. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers