On Thu, 17 Jun 2010, Magnus Hagander wrote:
What I'm referring to? The fact that at least last time I was looking at this, most (all other?) moderators *only* approve things. And never reject them, instead letting the timeout take care of things thatn shouldn't be posted. That means that if there are 10 moderators, every one of them needs to look at all the mails and ignore them. In cases of other lists where I moderate, people reject spam when they see it, which means that once I go in there I only see stuff that nobody else has already processed. Which makes for less double (or ten-double) work...
I sooooooo agree here ... and to make matters worse, when I go through all of the groups once a week, I find a half dozen or more postings that 'slipped through the cracks' that should have been approved, but weren't ... but to get there, I have to weed through *hundreds* of postings to find them ...
But, I think you and I are exceptions here, in that we use the web interface for moderation, and not just email ... although I'm not sure why its so far to do a 'Reply' and type 'Reject' since ppl have to have already checked the body of the message to now it shouldn't be approved ... most of the work is already done by that point ...
---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Hosting Solutions S.A. scra...@hub.org http://www.hub.org Yahoo:yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ:7615664 MSN:scra...@hub.org -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
