Excerpts from Robert Haas's message of lun jun 21 12:20:59 -0400 2010: > Barring vigorous objections, I will apply these tomorrow so that we > can consider deprecating => as an operator name in 9.1, for better > compliance with the SQL standard.
Maybe this is just a matter of semantics, but I thought we were going to deprecate => in 9.0 so that people started to avoid its use altogether. Why wait till 9.1 to recommend avoidance? I had imagined that 9.1 was going to ban => altogether. -- Álvaro Herrera <alvhe...@commandprompt.com> The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
