On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 12:40 PM, Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@commandprompt.com> wrote: > Excerpts from Robert Haas's message of lun jun 21 12:20:59 -0400 2010: > >> Barring vigorous objections, I will apply these tomorrow so that we >> can consider deprecating => as an operator name in 9.1, for better >> compliance with the SQL standard. > > Maybe this is just a matter of semantics, but I thought we were going to > deprecate => in 9.0 so that people started to avoid its use altogether. > Why wait till 9.1 to recommend avoidance? > > I had imagined that 9.1 was going to ban => altogether.
Sorry, bad phrasing on my part. Your understanding matches mine. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise Postgres Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
