Fujii Masao <masao.fu...@gmail.com> writes:
> On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 5:32 AM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> OK, here's a new version with several fewer bugs.
> Since valid values for keepalives parameter are 0 and 1, its field size should
> be 1 rather than 10.
Right ... although maybe it should be considered a boolean and not an
int at all?
> In this case, you can check the value of keepalives parameter by seeing
> conn->keepalives[0] instead of using strtol() in useKeepalives().
I disagree with that idea, though. The field size has nothing to do
with most of the possible sources of the variable's value ...
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
