On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 1:42 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > If I change the test to be > > fseeko(fp, 0, SEEK_SET) > > then it does the right thing. Since checkSeek() is applied immediately > after opening the input file this should be OK, but it does limit the > scope of usefulness of that function. > > Any thoughts about whether or not to apply such a patch? If it should > be changed, should we back-patch it?
Well, I guess it depends on what you think the chances are that the revised test will fail on some other obscure platform. Have there been any reports from the field? If not, I might apply to HEAD and await developments. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise Postgres Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
