Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes: > Dimitri Fontaine <dfonta...@hi-media.com> writes: >> Stop me if I'm all wrong already, but I though we said that we should >> handle this case by decoupling what we can send to the standby and what >> it can apply. > > What's the point of that? It won't make the standby apply any faster.
True, but it allows to send the WAL content before to ack its fsync. Regards. -- dim -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
