On 15 July 2010 17:07, Marc G. Fournier <scra...@hub.org> wrote: > On Thu, 15 Jul 2010, Thom Brown wrote: > >> If it's only a psql problem, why implement it as SQL? Is it just so we're >> not adding keywords specifically to psql? In that case, it shouldn't >> support QUIT. > > Personally, I think this is somethign that should go into the backend ... > I'd like to be able to write perl scripts that talk to the backend without > having to remember all the various system tables I need to query / join to > get the same results as \d gives me in psql ... same for any interface > language, really ... >
Isn't that what the information_schema catalog is for? Thom -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
