On 7/15/10, Andrew Dunstan <and...@dunslane.net> wrote: > Marko Kreen wrote: > > On 7/7/10, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > > Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: > > > > So what happens right now using the existing git repository is that > > > > the $PostgeSQL$ tags are there, but they're unexpanded. They just > say > > > > $PostgreSQL$ rather than $PostgreSQL: tgl blah blah$. > > > > > > > > > Really? All of them? Seems like that would have taken some intentional > > > processing somewhere. > > > > > > > > > > AFAIK that's what CVS actually keeps in repo, it expands keywords > > when writing files out. > > > > > > > > No. It stores the expanded keyword. Just look in the ,v files in a CVS > mirror and you'll see them.
Eh. I stand corrected - what it actually does is even more bizarre - it stores whatever is on the disk, but then expands on re-write. So: - r1.1 contains $Id$ in the repo. - r1.2 contains $Id: 1.1$ in the repo. and so on... -- marko -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
