Sorry, hit send too early. On 07/17/2010 01:47 PM, Markus Wanner wrote:
I think that I commented the source code pretty extensively, however, that's a subjective feeling.
Take this phrase.
I'm under the impression, that I commented the source code pretty well.
Scratch that, please. :-) You wrote:
Let's go for this in stages. If we can get something basic and useful for lots of people in this commitfest, we can layer on the other stuff later.
Hm.. agreed. That's why I split into dynshmem, imessages and steps 1 - 6 of bgworker.
I'm expecting controversy and discussion about dynshmem, which is a dependency of all of my other patches. So, maybe we should start there?
Or what kind of staging did you have in mind? Regards Markus -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
