* Robert Haas (robertmh...@gmail.com) wrote: > On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 3:57 AM, Simon Riggs <si...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > > On Thu, 2010-06-10 at 23:18 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > >> Nothing. The only reason to use those forms is in a join against > >> pg_authid, and the "public" group doesn't have an entry there. > > > > ISTM this bug should be on the open items list... > > I don't think this is a bug.
Agreed, and it's certainly not something that needs to be dealt with for
9.0..
Thanks,
Stephen
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
