On Wed, 2010-08-11 at 15:27 -0700, David Fetter wrote: > > > I've been developing it as a contrib module because: > > * I'd imagine it's easier than developing it as a built-in datatype > > right away (e.g. editing a .sql.in file versus editing pg_type.h ). > > * As a module, it has PGXS support, so people can try it out right > > away rather than having to recompile PostgreSQL. > > > > I, for one, think it would be great if the JSON datatype were all in > > core :-) However, if and how much JSON code should go into core is up > > for discussion. Thoughts, anyone? > > +1 for putting it in core in 9.1 :)
I would be curious to the benefit of putting it in core. I have no problem with the type but in core? Joshua D. Drake -- PostgreSQL.org Major Contributor Command Prompt, Inc: http://www.commandprompt.com/ - 509.416.6579 Consulting, Training, Support, Custom Development, Engineering http://twitter.com/cmdpromptinc | http://identi.ca/commandprompt -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers