Excerpts from Tom Lane's message of lun ago 23 12:40:32 -0400 2010: > Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@commandprompt.com> writes: > > Excerpts from Bruce Momjian's message of dom ago 22 12:51:47 -0400 2010: > >> Do you have a suggestion? Reorder the items? > > > I'd add another para before that one saying that this value "also" > > affects pg_clog truncation. I agree that putting pg_clog truncation as > > the first item here is not an improvement. For most people, having > > those pg_clog files there or not is going to be a wash, compared to data > > size. > > I was going to suggest that the point about pg_clog should be in a > separate paragraph *after* this one, since it seems like a secondary > issue. But anyway, I agree with putting this para back as it was and > talking about clog in a separate para.
Sorry, yes, I was also thinking "after". I don't know what made me write "before" but it wasn't clarity of thought. -- Álvaro Herrera <alvhe...@commandprompt.com> The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
