Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Excerpts from Bruce Momjian's message of lun ago 23 14:55:55 -0400 2010: > > > OK, I have attached a proposed patch to improve this. I moved the > > pg_clog mention to a new paragraph and linked it to the reason the > > default is relatively low. > > > > Comments? > > I think the new para doesn't make much sense, in context. Why does it > say "freeze"? How can we expect users to understand how that is > related to this parameter?
I have removed the freeze mention per Tom's comment and posted an updated version that removes the 'freeze' wording. Are there other changes needed? -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
