Marko et al, This is my first ever attempt of a patch review just for learning the procedure. I'm not a postgres developer, so the review is partial and mostly from the usability prospective. The original message id of the patch is 4bd58db3.4070...@cs.helsinki.fi<http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2010-04/msg01200.php>
Submssion review ========================= * Is he patch in context diff format? Ys * Dos it apply cleanly to the current CVS HEAD? Applies cleanly to a source code snapshot * Dos it include reasonable tests, necessary doc patches, etc? I does not require a doc patch. A test is not included, but it looks pretty trivial: -- Prpare the test tables drop table if exists foo; drop table if exists boo; crate table foo( a nt, b nt, c nt); crate table boo( a nt, b nt, c nt); insert into boo values (10,20,30); -- Actual test INSERT INTO foo(a,b,c) SELECT (a,b,c) FROM boo; INSERT INTO foo(a,b,c) VALUES((0,1,2)); Usability Review ========================= The patch provides a HINT for unclear error. This should clarify for a user what exactly is wrong with the sql. However, the actual HINT text provided with the patch is not very clear, too. The Stephen Frost's suggestion would add clarity: errhint("insert appears to be a single column with a record-type rather than multiple columns of non-composite type."), Feature test ========================= The feature works as advertised for the test provided above. No failures or crashes. No visible affect on performance