Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: > On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 9:58 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> Given the existence of the deadman switch mechanism (which I hadn't >> remembered when this thread started), I'm coming around to the idea that >> we could just treat exit(128) as nonfatal on Windows. If for some >> reason the child hadn't died instantly at startup, the deadman switch >> would distinguish that from the case described here.
> So do you want to code this up? Who, me? I don't do Windows --- I'd have no way to test it. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers