Excerpts from Robert Haas's message of vie ago 27 18:07:55 -0400 2010: > On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 5:57 PM, Kevin Grittner > <kevin.gritt...@wicourts.gov> wrote: > > Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I suppose this is unhappy because it things elog(ERROR) might > >> return? > > > > If I set these fields right in front of the elog(ERROR) the warnings > > go away for me. (Hopefully this observation will make up, to some > > extent, for my earlier brain fart.) > > I set them right after the ERROR so that those statements needn't > actually be executed.
Didn't we inject some smarts so that the compiler would notice that elog(ERROR) doesn't return? Why isn't it working here? -- Álvaro Herrera <alvhe...@commandprompt.com> The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
