I wrote: > Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> writes: >> Ok, found a bunch of those (78 to be exact).
> What I'd like is for those commits to vanish from the git log entirely. > In a practical sense, what you should probably do is for each file > mentioned in such a commit, cause the file's addition to the branch to > become part of the first regular commit on the branch that touched that > file. In the CVS history, at least, there always is such a commit > (since we never did the cvs tag -b thing). I am not sure though whether > the converted git history includes a touch of the file in that commit, Given that there are only 78 such commits, it would not take too long to manually prepare a list of which commit each file addition should get moved into. Would that be a more sensible approach than trying to extract the information from the git log? regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers