On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 10:08 AM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 9:56 AM, Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> wrote: >> You're saying you don't "require" a fix on the latest issue here? Or >> should we spend some time trying to figure out if we can fix it with >> git-filter-branch? > > I think that "the latest issue here" is the issue of how files get > added to branches, which we discussed before with pretty much the same > set of conclusions. I'm not wild about the way that's getting > converted, but I'm not sure I care enough about it to argue with Tom. > However, I want to convince myself that the deletes we've done over > the years have been properly handled. I need to look at Max's latest > conversion and I'll look at yours as well.
Magnus - I just looked at your latest conversion (based on what Max did) and it looks a lot better. I think, though, that we should re-remove these branches: origin/unlabeled-1.44.2 origin/unlabeled-1.51.2 origin/unlabeled-1.59.2 origin/unlabeled-1.87.2 origin/unlabeled-1.90.2 -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise Postgres Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
