On 09/08/2010 12:04 PM, Boszormenyi Zoltan wrote:
Then there is no use to implement individual sync/async replicated transactions, period.
I disagree. Different transactions have different priorities for latency vs. failure-resistance.
An async replicated transaction that waits for a sync replicated transaction because of locks will become implicitely sync.
Sure. But how often do your transactions wait for another one because of locks? What do we have MVCC for?
Regards Markus Wanner -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
