On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 20:23, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> writes: >> On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 19:48, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >>> On balance I think I'd suggest an #ifdef WIN32 in CleanupBackend that >>> made it accept 128 as a "normal exit" case. > >> Seems reasonable. I'll whack it around for that - see attached. > > Hm, still doesn't log, which I think it should, even for testing > purposes (how will you know the case occurred?). Maybe like this:
Agreed, that's better. >> Dave has a reasonably reproducible test environment. Unforunately it's >> on 8.3, so this patch will be completely unsafe there (it doesn't have >> the deadman switch). But hopefully it can be used to see it fixes this >> problem (while introducing others)h > > Sounds like a plan. Patch is with dave for testing now :-) -- Magnus Hagander Me: http://www.hagander.net/ Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/ -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
