Dave Page wrote: > On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 1:45 PM, Bruce Momjian <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > I am not sure how clear it is on Win32 that 128 is a special return > > code. > > I asked Microsoft platform support (roughly) that question. Here's the > response:
I assume we are going to summarize this in a C comment when we ignore 128 return codes. Can we assume all the mutexes will be cleaned up from a 128-exit? -- Bruce Momjian <[email protected]> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
