Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote: > > > So should I go ahead and submit a patch for BETWEEN that adds SYMMETRY > > > support in the old-style code, and then at a later stage submit > > a patch that > > > makes BETWEEN a proper node? > > > > Sure, I think that makes sense. The larger BETWEEN node code will be > > tricky. > > Question: Why have you created a special case for NOT BETWEEN? Wouldn't you > just need a BETWEEN node and the NOT node will handle the NOTing? > > Or is it because BETWEEN isn't a node at the moment?
Well, looking at the grammar, I don't know how I could have gotten NOT into that construction. There are two parameters separated by AND and I didn't know how to do it. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 853-3000 + If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html
