> "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > So should I go ahead and submit a patch for BETWEEN that adds SYMMETRY > > support in the old-style code, and then at a later stage submit > a patch that > > makes BETWEEN a proper node? > > I'd prefer to do it in one step. I have not noticed any large > groundswell of demand for BETWEEN SYMMETRIC ... so I don't see a good > reason for implementing a stopgap version. (It would be a stopgap > mainly because the planner wouldn't recognize it as a range query.)
OK, I'll go for the whole change - just expect lots of questions :) Chris ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
