psql's \dn command hides pg_temp_nn schemas, except for the current
backend's own temp schema (if any). However, when we added separate
pg_toast_temp_nn schemas for TOAST tables, \dn wasn't taught about that,
leading to such odd-looking output as this:
regression=# \dn
List of schemas
Name | Owner
--------------------+----------
information_schema | postgres
pg_catalog | postgres
pg_temp_2 | postgres
pg_toast | postgres
pg_toast_temp_1 | postgres
pg_toast_temp_2 | postgres
pg_toast_temp_3 | postgres
pg_toast_temp_4 | postgres
public | postgres
testxmlschema | postgres
(10 rows)
regression=#
This is at least inconsistent and at worst wildly misleading. ISTM
we ought to adopt some combination of the following ideas:
1. Don't show pg_toast_temp_nn schemas ever. Maybe hide pg_toast too
for consistency.
2. Show only the current backend's pg_toast_temp_nn schema. (Note:
I don't see any very easy way to implement that :-(; psql doesn't
have easy access to the backend's slot number. The way that it
identifies the pg_temp_nn schema is a hack that won't scale.)
3. Don't show either pg_temp_nn or pg_toast_temp_nn schemas, not even
for the current backend.
4. Forget about hiding these schemas at all.
With any of 1-3 we could also consider adding a rule that \dn+
doesn't hide them.
Thoughts?
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
