On fre, 2010-09-24 at 14:42 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > How do we want to define "system" exactly? My original proposal was > for bare \dn to hide the temp and toast schemas. If we consider that > what it's hiding is "system" schemas then there's some merit to the > idea that it should hide pg_catalog and information_schema too. > In that case, in a fresh database you would *only* see "public". > I'm not sure that I like this though. Comments?
I think that is sensible. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
