So, Can I increase the stack depth limit to a large value ?
> On 22/09/10 12:03, sub...@cse.iitb.ac.in wrote: >> Actually, I used palloc() to set the stack base address. >> And I am trying to create only a single thread, then also it is causing >> problem. >> Actually, I created all the data-structures using palloc(), then I am >> passing these to the child thread. Even if I make these variables global >> then also it is not working. >> But if I don't set its stack address then it is working. But I need to >> do >> that because when my thread body is big then it is causing stack fault. >> So if I cannot set its stack address then Can I increase the stack depth >> limit to a large value ? > > It's not clear what you're trying to do, but it's just not going to > work. The backend code is not thread-safe, so you can't safely create > any threads in server code. Not even a single one. And even if you > could, you should not mess with stack base addresses. > > -- > Heikki Linnakangas > EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com > -- Thank You, Subham Roy. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
