On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 16:08, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> writes:
>> On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 13:36, Andrew Dunstan <and...@dunslane.net> wrote:
>> I think the confusion is from the use of "tagged" in the commit
>> message
>
> Possibly Marc should adopt the habit of making the commit messages read
> like "Stamp 9.0.2", rather than "Tag".

+1, that sounds like a good idea.


-- 
 Magnus Hagander
 Me: http://www.hagander.net/
 Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to