Agreed, I thought of that when Andrew sent the original ...
On Sat, 2 Oct 2010, Magnus Hagander wrote:
On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 16:08, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> writes:
On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 13:36, Andrew Dunstan <and...@dunslane.net> wrote:
I think the confusion is from the use of "tagged" in the commit
message
Possibly Marc should adopt the habit of making the commit messages read
like "Stamp 9.0.2", rather than "Tag".
+1, that sounds like a good idea.
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Hosting Solutions S.A.
scra...@hub.org http://www.hub.org
Yahoo:yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ:7615664 MSN:scra...@hub.org
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
