On lör, 2010-10-16 at 09:23 -0700, Paul Ramsey wrote: > >> (And, if we are going to break everything > > in sight, now would be a good time to think about changing typmod to > > something more flexible than one int32.) > > As someone who is jamming geometry type, spatial reference number and > dimensionality into said 32bit typmod, let me say emphatically ... > Amen!
So what kind of data structure would you like for a typmod? -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
