On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 10:17 AM, Peter Eisentraut <pete...@gmx.net> wrote: > On lör, 2010-10-16 at 09:23 -0700, Paul Ramsey wrote: >> >> (And, if we are going to break everything >> > in sight, now would be a good time to think about changing typmod to >> > something more flexible than one int32.) >> >> As someone who is jamming geometry type, spatial reference number and >> dimensionality into said 32bit typmod, let me say emphatically ... >> Amen! > > So what kind of data structure would you like for a typmod?
I'm a primitive enough beast that just having 64-bits would make me happy. As a general matter though, a bytea? P -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
