* Bruce Momjian ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [020423 12:30]: > > 1 - All SETs are rolled back in aborted transaction > 2 - SETs are ignored after transaction abort > 3 - All SETs are honored in aborted transaction > ? - Have SETs vary in behavior depending on variable > > Our current behavior is 2. > > Please vote and I will tally the results.
#2, no change in behavior. But I base that on the assumption that #1 or #3 involve serious amounts of work, and don't see the big benefit. I liked the line of thought that was distinguishing between in-band (rolled back) and out-of-band (honored) SETs, although I don't think any acceptable syntax was arrived at, and I don't have a suggestion. If this were solved, I'd vote for '?'. Hmm. Maybe I do have a suggestion: SET [TRANSACTIONAL] ... But it might not be very practical. -Brad ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html
