Bradley McLean wrote: > * Bruce Momjian ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [020423 12:30]: > > > > 1 - All SETs are rolled back in aborted transaction > > 2 - SETs are ignored after transaction abort > > 3 - All SETs are honored in aborted transaction > > ? - Have SETs vary in behavior depending on variable > > > > Our current behavior is 2. > > > > Please vote and I will tally the results. > > #2, no change in behavior. > > But I base that on the assumption that #1 or #3 involve serious amounts > of work, and don't see the big benefit.
I don't want to make any big comments during the vote, but I should mention that #1 is needed by Tom's SET for namespace path, and #1 or #3 is needed to clearly handle query timeouts. Just thought I would refresh people's memory on how this discussion got started. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 853-3000 + If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
