Josh Berkus <j...@agliodbs.com> writes: > What would be sensible for DBAs is to have two settings:
> max_wal_size > min_wal_size [ scratches head... ] What's the functional effect of min_wal_size, exactly? > Even better would be to replace min_wal_size with min_wal_time, which > would set a time span for the oldest WAL segment to be kept (up to > max_wal_size - 2). Hmmm. That doesn't seem that hard to implement. > Is it? Um, what happens when honoring min_wal_time conflicts with honoring max_wal_size? regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers