Andrew Dunstan <and...@dunslane.net> writes:
> On 11/12/2010 01:40 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> FYI, I marked the TODO item for adding enums as completed. The TODO
>> item used to also mention renaming or removing enums, but I have seen
>> few requests for that so I removed that suggestion. We can always
>> re-add it if there is demand.
> Renaming an item would not be terribly hard. Removing one is that nasty
> case. There are all sorts of places the old value could be referred to:
> table data, view definitions, check constraints, functions etc.
Well, you can rename an item today if you don't mind doing a direct
UPDATE on pg_enum. I think that's probably sufficient if the demand
only amounts to one or two requests a year. I'd say leave it off the
TODO list till we see if there's more demand than that.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
