On 11/14/2010 10:44 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
And on the fourth hand, what we're buying here is pretty marginal for developers and of no interest whatever for users. I still think it's worth looking into whether the bug can be dodged by shortening the eval calls. But if not, I think I'd vote for reverting. Maybe we could revisit this in a couple of years.
+1 cheers andrew -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
